Интерфейс моделей ИИ

glm-for-coding

302ai/glm-for-coding

От 302ai · семейство: glm · выпуск 2025-09-30

⚠ Это сообществом дообученная / производная модель — не официальный релиз вендора.

$0.086
Вход / 1M токенов
$0.343
Выход / 1M токенов
200K
Окно контекста
131K
Макс. вывод

Prices in USD per 1M tokens. Unknown means the provider does not publish per-token pricing.

Возможности

Tool callingРассуждение? Структурированный выводВложенияОткрытые весаУправление температурой
Модальности: вход text · выход text

Model fit scores

0–100 · higher is better

These scores reward declared capabilities, context size, price and provider availability — they are not benchmark results. Use them as a directional signal alongside your own evaluation.

Coding57
  • Tool calling40/40
  • Structured output0/20
  • Reasoning10/10
  • Context window (100K → 1M)6/20
  • Provider availability1/10
Agents66
  • Tool calling35/35
  • Structured output0/25
  • Reasoning15/15
  • Output token limit15/15
  • Provider availability1/10
JSON / structured output49
  • Structured output / JSON mode0/50
  • Tool calling20/20
  • Temperature control10/10
  • Price-friendly for high-volume19/20
Cost efficiency71
  • Headline price (log-scaled)71/95
  • Has prompt-cache pricing0/5
Long context55
  • Context window (100K → 2M)45/90
  • Has published price for full window10/10
Production-readiness50
  • Number of independent providers5/40
  • Has published per-token price20/20
  • Context window ≥ 8K15/15
  • No data inconsistencies across providers10/10
  • Official model (not derivative)0/15

Cost Efficiency Index

Open full calculator →

Estimated cost using the recommended provider's headline rate. Each scenario fixes average input/output tokens — the assumptions are shown in the third column.

ScenarioCostAssumption
RAG answer
per 1,000 RAG answers
$0.60
< $0.01 per request
5K input tokens (query + 4 retrieved chunks of ~1K each) and a 500-token answer. Typical SaaS knowledge-base bot.
Support ticket triage
per 10,000 tickets
$1.20
< $0.01 per request
1K input tokens (ticket body + system prompt) and a 100-token JSON classification reply. High-volume customer support.
Data extraction
per 1,000 documents
$0.34
< $0.01 per request
2K input tokens (a single document page) and a 500-token JSON extraction. ETL / invoice / form pipelines.
Code review
per 1,000 PRs
$1.03
< $0.01 per request
8K input tokens (diff + surrounding files) and a 1K-token review comment. PR-bot workloads.
Agent step
per 1,000 steps
$1.24
< $0.01 per request
12K input tokens (long-running tool history) and a 600-token tool-call decision. Cost per agent step.

Детализация цен

Рекомендованная цена от 302ai · glm-for-coding

$0.086
Вход
$0.343
Выход

Доступна у 1 провайдеров

ПровайдерID модели провайдераВход / 1MВыход / 1MКонтекстВыпуск
302.AI
302ai
glm-for-coding$0.086$0.343200K2025-09-30

Frequently asked questions

How much does glm-for-coding cost?

glm-for-coding costs $0.086 per 1M input tokens and $0.343 per 1M output tokens, sourced from 302ai. Cache reads, audio tokens and >200K-context tiers (where applicable) are listed in the Pricing detail block above.

What is the context window of glm-for-coding?

glm-for-coding has a context window of 200K tokens, with a max output of 131K tokens per reply. This is the total combined size of prompt + completion.

Does glm-for-coding support tool calling?

Yes. glm-for-coding supports tool calling (function calling). This makes it suitable for production agent and automation workloads where the model has to invoke external functions reliably.

Does glm-for-coding support structured output / JSON mode?

Support for structured output / JSON-schema-constrained decoding is not reported for glm-for-coding in our data source. Verify with 302ai's official documentation before relying on it in production.

Can glm-for-coding accept image input?

No. glm-for-coding only accepts text as input. If you need image input, see our /capabilities/vision list for current vision-capable models.

Is glm-for-coding open-weight?

No. glm-for-coding is a proprietary model — only 302ai (and any approved hosting partners) can serve it. The pricing above reflects the cheapest API access.

What are the best alternatives to glm-for-coding?

If glm-for-coding doesn't fit, consider ministral-14b-2512. Each one targets the same use case — see the Related links below for direct head-to-head pages.

Where does this data come from?

All numbers come from the public models.dev API and are normalised into a single canonical model record. We re-pull daily and write any changes (price, context, capability) to the /changelog page.

Последнее обновление:

Data is sourced from models.dev and normalized for comparison. Prices and capabilities may change. Always verify critical production decisions with the provider's official documentation.