Comparison · 2026-08-13
GPT-5.1 Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window and capabilities for GPT-5.1 Codex (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) (Anthropic). Focus: coding.
| GPT-5.1 Codex | Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Input price / 1M tokens | $1.07 | $3.00 |
| Output price / 1M tokens | $8.50 | $15.00 |
| Total per 1M (in + out) | $9.57 | $18.00 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output tokens | 128K | 64K |
| Tool calling | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Structured output | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reasoning | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Vision input | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open weights | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Provider availability | 18 providers | 23 providers |
| Release date | 2025-11-13 | 2025-09-29 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-09-30 | 2025-07-31 |
Quick takeaway
- GPT-5.1 Codex is 1.9× cheaper per 1M tokens (input + output combined).
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) has a larger context window (1M vs 400K).
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) is more widely available across providers (23 vs 18).
How to read this comparison
This page compares GPT-5.1 Codex and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) on the dimensions that matter most for production LLM selection: per-token cost, context window, declared capabilities (tool calling, structured output, reasoning, vision), and provider availability.
Green highlights in the table indicate which model leads on a given row. "Leads" means lower price or higher context/capability — not necessarily "better for your use case". A model that costs 3× more may still be the right choice if it unlocks a capability you need.
What this comparison does NOT tell you
- Quality / accuracy — we have no benchmark data. Declared capabilities ≠ measured performance.
- Latency — time-to-first-token varies by provider, region and load. Test with your actual traffic.
- Prompt caching savings — if you reuse system prompts, the cheaper model on headline rate may not be cheapest in practice.
- Fine-tuning availability — not all models can be fine-tuned, even if they are open-weight.
Data is refreshed daily. If a model's capabilities or pricing change, this page updates automatically on the next build cycle.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1 Codex cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)?
GPT-5.1 Codex costs $1.07/1M tokens input + $8.50/1M tokens output, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) costs $3.00/1M tokens input + $15.00/1M tokens output. GPT-5.1 Codex is cheaper per combined 1M tokens.
Which model has a longer context window, GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) supports a longer context window — 1,000,000 tokens vs 400,000 tokens.
Where can I run GPT-5.1 Codex and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)?
GPT-5.1 Codex is available on 18 providers; Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) is available on 23 providers. See each model's detail page for the full provider list.
Explore more
Last updated:
Prices in USD per 1M tokens. Unknown means the provider does not publish per-token pricing.
Pricing and capabilities are refreshed daily and reconciled against each provider's official documentation. Always verify critical production decisions with the provider directly.