Comparación · 2026-06-29
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest)
Comparación de precios, ventana de contexto y capacidades entre Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) y Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) (Anthropic). Enfoque: cheap vs premium.
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) | |
|---|---|---|
| Editor | Anthropic | |
| Precio de entrada / 1M tokens | $0.300 | $1.00 |
| Precio de salida / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $5.00 |
| Total por 1M (entrada + salida) | $2.80 | $6.00 |
| Ventana de contexto | 1.05M | 200K |
| Tokens de salida máximos | 66K | 64K |
| Llamada a herramientas | ✓ Sí | ✓ Sí |
| Salida estructurada | ✓ Sí | Desconocido |
| Razonamiento | ✓ Sí | ✓ Sí |
| Entrada de imagen | ✓ Sí | ✓ Sí |
| Pesos abiertos | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Disponibilidad de proveedores | 27 proveedores | 23 proveedores |
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 2025-06-17 | 2025-10-15 |
| Fecha de conocimiento | 2025-01 | 2025-02-28 |
Conclusión rápida
- Gemini 2.5 Flash es unas 2.1× más barato por 1M de tokens combinados (entrada + salida).
- Gemini 2.5 Flash tiene una ventana de contexto mayor (1.05M frente a 200K).
- Solo Gemini 2.5 Flash admite salida estructurada / modo JSON.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash está disponible en más proveedores (27 frente a 23).
How to read this comparison
This page compares Gemini 2.5 Flash and Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) on the dimensions that matter most for production LLM selection: per-token cost, context window, declared capabilities (tool calling, structured output, reasoning, vision), and provider availability.
Green highlights in the table indicate which model leads on a given row. "Leads" means lower price or higher context/capability — not necessarily "better for your use case". A model that costs 3× more may still be the right choice if it unlocks a capability you need.
What this comparison does NOT tell you
- Quality / accuracy — we have no benchmark data. Declared capabilities ≠ measured performance.
- Latency — time-to-first-token varies by provider, region and load. Test with your actual traffic.
- Prompt caching savings — if you reuse system prompts, the cheaper model on headline rate may not be cheapest in practice.
- Fine-tuning availability — not all models can be fine-tuned, even if they are open-weight.
Data is refreshed daily. If a model's capabilities or pricing change, this page updates automatically on the next build cycle.
Frequently asked questions
¿Gemini 2.5 Flash es más barato que Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest)?
Gemini 2.5 Flash cuesta $0.300/1M tokens de entrada + $2.50/1M de salida; Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) cuesta $1.00/1M + $5.00/1M. La opción más barata por 1M combinados es Gemini 2.5 Flash.
¿Qué modelo tiene una ventana de contexto más larga, Gemini 2.5 Flash o Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest)?
Gemini 2.5 Flash admite una ventana más larga: 1,048,576 tokens frente a 200,000.
¿Dónde puedo ejecutar Gemini 2.5 Flash y Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest)?
Gemini 2.5 Flash está en 27 proveedores; Claude Haiku 4.5 (latest) en 23. Ve la lista completa en cada página de modelo.
Explore more
Última actualización:
Prices in USD per 1M tokens. Unknown means the provider does not publish per-token pricing.
Pricing and capabilities are refreshed daily and reconciled against each provider's official documentation. Always verify critical production decisions with the provider directly.