Intelligence des modèles d'IA

Trinity Large

nano-gpt/trinity-large

Par nano-gpt · famille: trinity · sorti 2025-12-01

$0.250
Entrée / 1M jetons
$1.00
Sortie / 1M jetons
131K
Fenêtre de contexte
8K
Sortie max

Prices in USD per 1M tokens. Unknown means the provider does not publish per-token pricing.

Capacités

Tool callingRaisonnementSortie structuréePièces jointesPoids ouverts? Contrôle de température
Modalités: entrée text · sortie text

Model fit scores

0–100 · higher is better

These scores reward declared capabilities, context size, price and provider availability — they are not benchmark results. Use them as a directional signal alongside your own evaluation.

Coding3
  • Tool calling0/40
  • Structured output0/20
  • Reasoning0/10
  • Context window (100K → 1M)2/20
  • Provider availability1/10
Agents6
  • Tool calling0/35
  • Structured output0/25
  • Reasoning0/15
  • Output token limit5/15
  • Provider availability1/10
JSON / structured output18
  • Structured output / JSON mode0/50
  • Tool calling0/20
  • Temperature control0/10
  • Price-friendly for high-volume18/20
Cost efficiency60
  • Headline price (log-scaled)60/95
  • Has prompt-cache pricing0/5
Long context46
  • Context window (100K → 2M)36/90
  • Has published price for full window10/10
Production-readiness65
  • Number of independent providers5/40
  • Has published per-token price20/20
  • Context window ≥ 8K15/15
  • No data inconsistencies across providers10/10
  • Official model (not derivative)15/15

Cost Efficiency Index

Open full calculator →

Estimated cost using the recommended provider's headline rate. Each scenario fixes average input/output tokens — the assumptions are shown in the third column.

ScenarioCostAssumption
RAG answer
per 1,000 RAG answers
$1.75
< $0.01 per request
5K input tokens (query + 4 retrieved chunks of ~1K each) and a 500-token answer. Typical SaaS knowledge-base bot.
Support ticket triage
per 10,000 tickets
$3.50
< $0.01 per request
1K input tokens (ticket body + system prompt) and a 100-token JSON classification reply. High-volume customer support.
Data extraction
per 1,000 documents
$1.00
< $0.01 per request
2K input tokens (a single document page) and a 500-token JSON extraction. ETL / invoice / form pipelines.
Code review
per 1,000 PRs
$3.00
< $0.01 per request
8K input tokens (diff + surrounding files) and a 1K-token review comment. PR-bot workloads.
Agent step
per 1,000 steps
$3.60
< $0.01 per request
12K input tokens (long-running tool history) and a 600-token tool-call decision. Cost per agent step.

Détail des tarifs

Tarif recommandé de nano-gpt · arcee-ai/trinity-large

$0.250
Entrée
$1.00
Sortie

Disponible chez 1 fournisseurs

FournisseurID modèle fournisseurEntrée / 1MSortie / 1MContextePublié le
NanoGPT
nano-gpt
arcee-ai/trinity-large$0.250$1.00131K2025-12-01

Frequently asked questions

How much does Trinity Large cost?

Trinity Large costs $0.250 per 1M input tokens and $1.00 per 1M output tokens, sourced from nano-gpt. Cache reads, audio tokens and >200K-context tiers (where applicable) are listed in the Pricing detail block above.

What is the context window of Trinity Large?

Trinity Large has a context window of 131K tokens, with a max output of 8K tokens per reply. This is the total combined size of prompt + completion.

Does Trinity Large support tool calling?

No. Trinity Large does not support tool calling (function calling). If your workflow requires it, look at the /capabilities/tool-calling list for alternatives.

Does Trinity Large support structured output / JSON mode?

No. Trinity Large does not support structured output / JSON-schema-constrained decoding. If your workflow requires it, look at the /capabilities/structured-output list for alternatives.

Can Trinity Large accept image input?

No. Trinity Large only accepts text as input. If you need image input, see our /capabilities/vision list for current vision-capable models.

Is Trinity Large open-weight?

No. Trinity Large is a proprietary model — only nano-gpt (and any approved hosting partners) can serve it. The pricing above reflects the cheapest API access.

What are the best alternatives to Trinity Large?

If Trinity Large doesn't fit, consider Brave (Answers), Exa (Research), Auto model (Basic). Each one targets the same use case — see the Related links below for direct head-to-head pages.

Where does this data come from?

All numbers come from the public models.dev API and are normalised into a single canonical model record. We re-pull daily and write any changes (price, context, capability) to the /changelog page.

More nano-gpt models

Dernière mise à jour :

Data is sourced from models.dev and normalized for comparison. Prices and capabilities may change. Always verify critical production decisions with the provider's official documentation.