AIモデルインテリジェンス

GLM 4.6 Thinking

nano-gpt/glm-4-6-thinking

提供: nano-gpt · ファミリー: glm · リリース 2025-09-29

⚠ これはコミュニティのファインチューン / 派生モデルで、ベンダーの公式リリースではありません。

$0.400
入力 / 100万トークン
$1.50
出力 / 100万トークン
200K
コンテキスト長
66K
最大出力

Prices in USD per 1M tokens. Unknown means the provider does not publish per-token pricing.

機能一覧

ツール呼び出し推論構造化出力添付オープンウェイト? 温度制御
モダリティ: 入力 text · 出力 text

Model fit scores

0–100 · higher is better

These scores reward declared capabilities, context size, price and provider availability — they are not benchmark results. Use them as a directional signal alongside your own evaluation.

Coding77
  • Tool calling40/40
  • Structured output20/20
  • Reasoning10/10
  • Context window (100K → 1M)6/20
  • Provider availability1/10
Agents91
  • Tool calling35/35
  • Structured output25/25
  • Reasoning15/15
  • Output token limit15/15
  • Provider availability1/10
JSON / structured output86
  • Structured output / JSON mode50/50
  • Tool calling20/20
  • Temperature control0/10
  • Price-friendly for high-volume16/20
Cost efficiency55
  • Headline price (log-scaled)55/95
  • Has prompt-cache pricing0/5
Long context55
  • Context window (100K → 2M)45/90
  • Has published price for full window10/10
Production-readiness50
  • Number of independent providers5/40
  • Has published per-token price20/20
  • Context window ≥ 8K15/15
  • No data inconsistencies across providers10/10
  • Official model (not derivative)0/15

Cost Efficiency Index

Open full calculator →

Estimated cost using the recommended provider's headline rate. Each scenario fixes average input/output tokens — the assumptions are shown in the third column.

ScenarioCostAssumption
RAG answer
per 1,000 RAG answers
$2.75
< $0.01 per request
5K input tokens (query + 4 retrieved chunks of ~1K each) and a 500-token answer. Typical SaaS knowledge-base bot.
Support ticket triage
per 10,000 tickets
$5.50
< $0.01 per request
1K input tokens (ticket body + system prompt) and a 100-token JSON classification reply. High-volume customer support.
Data extraction
per 1,000 documents
$1.55
< $0.01 per request
2K input tokens (a single document page) and a 500-token JSON extraction. ETL / invoice / form pipelines.
Code review
per 1,000 PRs
$4.70
< $0.01 per request
8K input tokens (diff + surrounding files) and a 1K-token review comment. PR-bot workloads.
Agent step
per 1,000 steps
$5.70
< $0.01 per request
12K input tokens (long-running tool history) and a 600-token tool-call decision. Cost per agent step.

料金詳細

推奨料金 (提供元): nano-gpt · z-ai/glm-4.6:thinking

$0.400
入力
$1.50
出力

1 か所で利用可能

プロバイダープロバイダーモデルID入力 / 1M出力 / 1Mコンテキストリリース日
NanoGPT
nano-gpt
z-ai/glm-4.6:thinking$0.400$1.50200K2025-09-29

Frequently asked questions

How much does GLM 4.6 Thinking cost?

GLM 4.6 Thinking costs $0.400 per 1M input tokens and $1.50 per 1M output tokens, sourced from nano-gpt. Cache reads, audio tokens and >200K-context tiers (where applicable) are listed in the Pricing detail block above.

What is the context window of GLM 4.6 Thinking?

GLM 4.6 Thinking has a context window of 200K tokens, with a max output of 66K tokens per reply. This is the total combined size of prompt + completion.

Does GLM 4.6 Thinking support tool calling?

Yes. GLM 4.6 Thinking supports tool calling (function calling). This makes it suitable for production agent and automation workloads where the model has to invoke external functions reliably.

Does GLM 4.6 Thinking support structured output / JSON mode?

Yes. GLM 4.6 Thinking supports structured output / JSON-schema-constrained decoding. This makes it suitable for production agent and automation workloads where the model has to invoke external functions reliably.

Can GLM 4.6 Thinking accept image input?

No. GLM 4.6 Thinking only accepts text as input. If you need image input, see our /capabilities/vision list for current vision-capable models.

Is GLM 4.6 Thinking open-weight?

No. GLM 4.6 Thinking is a proprietary model — only nano-gpt (and any approved hosting partners) can serve it. The pricing above reflects the cheapest API access.

What are the best alternatives to GLM 4.6 Thinking?

If GLM 4.6 Thinking doesn't fit, consider Brave (Answers), Exa (Research), Auto model (Basic). Each one targets the same use case — see the Related links below for direct head-to-head pages.

Where does this data come from?

All numbers come from the public models.dev API and are normalised into a single canonical model record. We re-pull daily and write any changes (price, context, capability) to the /changelog page.

More nano-gpt models

最終更新:

Data is sourced from models.dev and normalized for comparison. Prices and capabilities may change. Always verify critical production decisions with the provider's official documentation.