AI 模型情报

gpt-5-thinking

302ai/gpt-5-thinking

出品方: 302ai · 发布 2025-08-08 · 知识截止: 2024-10

⚠ 本模型为社区微调 / 衍生版本,非厂商官方发布。

$1.25
输入 / 1M token
$10.00
输出 / 1M token
400K
上下文长度
128K
最大输出

Prices in USD per 1M tokens. Unknown means the provider does not publish per-token pricing.

能力清单

工具调用推理? 结构化输出附件开放权重温度可调
支持模态: 输入 text, image · 输出 text

Model fit scores

0–100 · higher is better

These scores reward declared capabilities, context size, price and provider availability — they are not benchmark results. Use them as a directional signal alongside your own evaluation.

Coding63
  • Tool calling40/40
  • Structured output0/20
  • Reasoning10/10
  • Context window (100K → 1M)12/20
  • Provider availability1/10
Agents66
  • Tool calling35/35
  • Structured output0/25
  • Reasoning15/15
  • Output token limit15/15
  • Provider availability1/10
JSON / structured output30
  • Structured output / JSON mode0/50
  • Tool calling20/20
  • Temperature control10/10
  • Price-friendly for high-volume0/20
Cost efficiency36
  • Headline price (log-scaled)36/95
  • Has prompt-cache pricing0/5
Long context70
  • Context window (100K → 2M)60/90
  • Has published price for full window10/10
Vision85
  • Accepts image input50/50
  • Context window (10K → 1M)24/30
  • Has published price10/10
  • Provider availability1/10
Production-readiness50
  • Number of independent providers5/40
  • Has published per-token price20/20
  • Context window ≥ 8K15/15
  • No data inconsistencies across providers10/10
  • Official model (not derivative)0/15

Cost Efficiency Index

Open full calculator →

Estimated cost using the recommended provider's headline rate. Each scenario fixes average input/output tokens — the assumptions are shown in the third column.

ScenarioCostAssumption
RAG answer
per 1,000 RAG answers
$11.25
$0.01 per request
5K input tokens (query + 4 retrieved chunks of ~1K each) and a 500-token answer. Typical SaaS knowledge-base bot.
Support ticket triage
per 10,000 tickets
$22.50
< $0.01 per request
1K input tokens (ticket body + system prompt) and a 100-token JSON classification reply. High-volume customer support.
Data extraction
per 1,000 documents
$7.50
< $0.01 per request
2K input tokens (a single document page) and a 500-token JSON extraction. ETL / invoice / form pipelines.
Code review
per 1,000 PRs
$20.00
$0.02 per request
8K input tokens (diff + surrounding files) and a 1K-token review comment. PR-bot workloads.
Agent step
per 1,000 steps
$21.00
$0.02 per request
12K input tokens (long-running tool history) and a 600-token tool-call decision. Cost per agent step.

定价详情

推荐定价来自 302ai · gpt-5-thinking

$1.25
输入
$10.00
输出

在 1 家渠道可用

服务商服务商模型 ID输入 / 1M输出 / 1M上下文发布日期
302.AI
302ai
gpt-5-thinking$1.25$10.00400K2025-08-08

Frequently asked questions

How much does gpt-5-thinking cost?

gpt-5-thinking costs $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens, sourced from 302ai. Cache reads, audio tokens and >200K-context tiers (where applicable) are listed in the Pricing detail block above.

What is the context window of gpt-5-thinking?

gpt-5-thinking has a context window of 400K tokens, with a max output of 128K tokens per reply. This is the total combined size of prompt + completion.

Does gpt-5-thinking support tool calling?

Yes. gpt-5-thinking supports tool calling (function calling). This makes it suitable for production agent and automation workloads where the model has to invoke external functions reliably.

Does gpt-5-thinking support structured output / JSON mode?

Support for structured output / JSON-schema-constrained decoding is not reported for gpt-5-thinking in our data source. Verify with 302ai's official documentation before relying on it in production.

Can gpt-5-thinking accept image input?

Yes. gpt-5-thinking accepts both text and image input. Vision pricing per image is usually billed on top of the regular token rate — check 302ai's docs for the exact rule.

Is gpt-5-thinking open-weight?

No. gpt-5-thinking is a proprietary model — only 302ai (and any approved hosting partners) can serve it. The pricing above reflects the cheapest API access.

What are the best alternatives to gpt-5-thinking?

If gpt-5-thinking doesn't fit, consider ministral-14b-2512. Each one targets the same use case — see the Related links below for direct head-to-head pages.

Where does this data come from?

All numbers come from the public models.dev API and are normalised into a single canonical model record. We re-pull daily and write any changes (price, context, capability) to the /changelog page.

最近更新:

Data is sourced from models.dev and normalized for comparison. Prices and capabilities may change. Always verify critical production decisions with the provider's official documentation.